Skip to content

Brain Dump on Updated Atwoods

September 29, 2017

This semester, we again did half Atwood’s to explore data about how force effects acceleration.


We use force sensor to measure tension in string, and a motion detector to examine velocity vs time graphs.


The data above is from a student group. Lots of features to notice and wonder about. The tension decreases upon release. The cart accelerates and then when hanging mass hits, the tension drop to zero. At that moment the speed levels off. And then cart crashes. I

I model the first data collection point, since there are a lot of little things to get right and notice.  Next time, I definitely want to still model the fist point, but use clicker questions or what do you notice questions to help interpret the graphs.

And then groups try to replicate my data point and are assigned a new hanging mass to test. Before they do, we brainstorm what we need to make the same and make sure we do. The kinda of things we need to consider are:

  • Same Mass of Cart
  • Zero force sensor properly
  • Use a level track
  • Make sure string is level with track
  • Make sure motion detector is seeing cart properly along entire track. 
  • Start cart outside the blind spot of detector (not too close)
  • Keep the force sensor cable slack as cart moves
  • Do Multiple trials 
  • Make sure friction pad is up and not rubbing on track. 
  • Make sure masses and string are free to move with out obstruction or rubbing. 
  • Replicate and verify one of their groups data point. 

Next time I’d like to make groups 

1. Replicate another groups data point, which you think perhaps is off in some way.   This invites looking for patterns and skepticism. 

2. Request that another group replicate your data point. This invites idea of collaboration and independent review.

The carts are designed to be 1.0 kg to 2 sig figs. 
We aggregate our data in a table and a graph, of acceleration vs force. And then We spend a fair bit of the day making sense of the data and the graph and then introducing Newton’s 2nd law.  Examining the special case of 1.0kg case specifically really helps. After, There is some direct instruction and clicker questions, a lot around examining mock experiments of different carts to get at mass. Next time, I’d like to do have handouts for students to examine the mock data (instead of a clicker question), and end day with a ranking task  (laminated card sort) for Newtons 2nd law. 

Our day ends with driving at Newton’s 1st law with hoverpucks, bowling balls, and phet sims. This year I first asked what happens to force when we lose contact. And then we talk about what happens to speed. We had a great discussion about assumptions.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. September 29, 2017 4:05 pm

    Brian, can you tell me a bit more about why you set the carts up the way you do? What’s the point of having two carts connected by magnets separated by the target? And the friction pad? Is that just an extension you do at the end?

    • September 29, 2017 4:52 pm

      It’s just a crazy way to get 1.0 kg pretty exact.

Trackbacks

  1. My Take on Learning from Laboratory Activities | Teach. Brian. Teach.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: